Learn about management Innovation
How does Toyota manage to implement one million new creative ideas each year?
How does an organization implement one million new creative ideas each year? And become a perennial top ten profitable companies of the world. And achieve market leadership while relentlessly pursuing perfection and delivering some of the best new innovations the world has ever seen.
Bill Gore a legendary Management Innovator
Could you create a company with no “core” business, where people would put as much energy into finding the next big thing as they did into milking the last big thing?
Read article Management the Google way where
Google CEO, Eric Schmidt.answers questions about the forces which had shaped and continue to shape the management of Google.
Read article
.
Interview with Dr. Michael J. Mol
Chair of the Conference "Rethinking the principles of Management"
CBW article : Innovation can stop natural selection on the Czech car market
Czech carmakers have so far been among the sectors most affected by the economic crisis. With sales dropping by 12.3 percent only in January 2009, car producers had to cut deep in their costs and are now looking for more solutions to ensure their sustainability, but experts claim only real innovations can safeguard these businesses on a longer term.
Review of Michael Mol and Julian Birkinshaws book: Giant Steps in Management
Management innovation: a survival tool in times of crisis
While the global recession is steadily embracing countries that only half a year ago were perceived as safe economic havens—the Czech Republic included—and as it’s now obvious that only those who come up fast with brilliant new business ideas will survive the crisis, a book published last year by two British researchers in management strategy offers a gripping retrospective in the role and history of management innovation.
Read article
International Innovation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Innovation and science in Denmark
The Innovative University
Extract focusing on Aalborg University (Denmark) from a collection of case studies of eight “innovative” Universities in EU which are partners of the European Consortium of Innovative Universities (ECIU). The report is deliverable D4 of the DIFUSE project (Driving innovation from universities into scientific enterprises) and was the key output of the second work package “Assessment of Current Tech Transfer Practice”. The project was funded under the Sixth Framework programme, ‘Structuring the European Research Area’ – Research and Innovation - for Identification of New Methods of Promoting and Encouraging Trans-national Technology Transfer
DIFUSE is a project that aimed to evaluate existing practice and develop a model for transnational cooperation between university knowledge transfer support functions with ECIU and to facilitate industrial and commercial exploitation of university services, products and inventions, notably arising from the Consortium’s research outcomes. The specific object of this Study is to explore current Knowledge Transfer policy and practice across the eight DIFUSE Project consortium partners
Key initiatives in the Danish research strategy
The Danish Government published a globalisation strategy in April 2006, containing 350 specific initiatives, which together entail extensive reforms of education and training programmes as well as research and entrepreneurship, and also substantial improvements in the framework conditions for growth and innovation in all areas of society. Its main goals are securing Denmark a strong competitive strength in the globalised market economy as well as a strong social coherence.
The Industrial PhD
An effective tool for innovation and knowledge sharing
The Industrial PhD programme was originally established in 1970 as the Industrial Research Programme. The Industrial Research Programme was established as a two-year licentiate course. In early 1989, the programme was changed to a three-year PhD course under the Danish Council for the Promotion of Industrial Development. In 2000, it was transferred to the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.
This report is based on the experience gained from PhD projects completed in 1992 or later, and the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation database of projects that started from 2002 and on. It is the most comprehensive analysis to date of the Industrial PhD course and its effect on the surrounding society. The Industrial PhD programme has been evaluated on an ongoing basis, and this report is a summary of the most recent analyses and studies. Some of the evaluations have not been published before. Oxford Research prepared the report for the Danish Council for Technology and Innovation.
Public Research Commercialisation Survey Denmark 2008
The annual commercialisation survey illustrates the efforts and performance of public research institutions in technology transfer. The commercialisation survey constitutes one initiative among several, to monitor and provide documentation of the national efforts in knowledge transfer under the commercialisation survey constitutes one initiative among several, to monitor and provide documentation of the national efforts in knowledge transfer under the Danish Council for Technology and Innovation
Monitoring and analysis of policies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments- Country Review DENMARK
This report is one of the 31 country reviews produced under the project “Monitoring and analysis of policies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments” The role of country reviews is to provide a first exploratory analysis of the current policy mixes in place in all countries and detect most important areas of interactions between instruments as well as new modes of policy governance that are particularly adapted (or detrimental) for the building of policy mixes. A horizontal analysis of these country reviews will lead to the identification of typical policy mixes, to be related to particular NIS characteristics.
The country reviews are based on the methodological framework produced by the consortium to frame the “policy mix” concept. They have been implemented on the basis of expert assessments derived from the analysis of NIS characteristics and policy mix settings, using key information sources such as Trendchart and ERAWATCH reports, OECD reviews, and national sources, among which the National Reform Programmes.
In this work, the “policy mix for R&D” is defined as: “the combination of policy instruments, which interact to influence the quantity and quality of R&D investments in public and private sectors. “
Science, Technology and Competitiveness
Key figures report 2008/2009
The status of the European Research Area: Europe's progress towards a knowledge-based economy policed by the EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Marie Curie
